Right model. Right task.
Across the whole lifecycle.
A tiered architecture with Claude Opus for reasoning and Gemini Flash for volume delivers enterprise-grade quality at a fraction of the cost — from code generation to nightly agentic workflows.
Claude Opus 4.8
Frontier reasoning
$5 / $25 per 1M tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Fast, native multimodal
$1.50 / $9 per 1M tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
High-volume routing
$0.25 / $1.50 per 1M tokens
AI-Assisted Software Development
Your engineers don't need frontier intelligence for every task.
75% of coding tasks are routine — tests, scaffolds, docs, CRUD. A tiered strategy routes them to Flash at ⅓ the cost, reserving Opus for architecture and hard debugging.
Routing Strategy
Team Configuration
Tiered Cost
$0.00
over 13 sprints · 12 developers
You save
$0.00
All-Frontier / Sprint
$337.50
100% Claude Opus 4.8
Tiered / Sprint
$202.50
Flash + Opus mix
Task Board — 20 tasks
Hover for routing rationale
Task Mix
Cost Comparison
Model Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Bottom line: A 12-person team saves $1.75K over 13 sprints by routing routine tasks to Flash — with zero quality trade-off on complex work.
In-App Intelligence
Same question. One answer costs 10–20× less. Can you tell?
Select a question
Select a question above to compare model responses
Monthly Query Volume
Adjust to match your expected in-app traffic
Monthly COGS Comparison
All-Frontier (100% Opus)
$0.000000
$1.2M/yr
Tiered Routing
$0.000000
$359K/yr
Tiered routing mix
Monthly: $70K saved · Tiered: $30K/mo vs All-Frontier: $100K/mo
Honesty note:The 60/20/20 tiered split (Flash-Lite / Flash / Opus) reflects real query distribution in wealth management. Routine lookups and FAQs (~80%) achieve parity across models. Complex planning questions (~20%) show measurably better output from Opus — that's why they still route to frontier. The savings come from volume, not from cutting quality where it matters.
Multimodal & Latency
Client photographs a statement and asks “what changed?” — comparing pure-Claude, pure-Gemini, and hybrid pipelines on speed, cost, and quality.
Incoming Statements
Pipeline Race — Text Mode
Extend · Scenario 4
Agentic Orchestration
Every night an agent reviews 50,000 portfolios. It decomposes each rebalancing job into 18 steps—only the planner and reviewer need frontier reasoning. The 16 executor steps run on Flash.
Per-Run Cost Breakdown
Executor volume dominates total cost — this is where tiering shines.
Scale Simulator
Drag to set nightly portfolio volume. Costs scale linearly.
Nightly (All-Opus)
$44K
Nightly (Hybrid)
$20K
All-Opus
$15.9M
Hybrid
$7.2M
Annual Savings
$8.8M
55% reduction
The planner thinks with Opus. The executors run with Flash.
Only 2 of 18 agent steps require frontier reasoning — the planner that decomposes the rebalancing task and the compliance reviewer that signs off. The 16 executor steps (data retrieval, calculations, formatting) are pattern-following work. Routing them to Flash cuts per-run cost from $0.8725 to $0.3925. At 50K portfolios nightly, that's $8.8M/yr saved.
Lifecycle Summary
Accumulated savings across Build → Run → Extend, driven by your current slider configurations.